link Makefile, https fix
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe5d354a59
commit
d47199e4fe
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ To fail means to get feedback. To get feedback means to **publish**. That's righ
|
|||
|
||||
For example, Katy identified daily stand ups used in agile teams as a useful way to identify what was blocking her progress by doing a stand-up with... yourself! That way she got feedback from herself. A PhD can be a lonely process indeed, but it doesn't have to be that way. You can change that yourself by explicitly asking feedback to your peers, colleagues and friends.
|
||||
|
||||
My way to get feedback is to follow in Jake's footsteps and to simply [publish **everything** on Github](wgroeneveld.github.io/phd). Add a big "feedback" button that redirects to the Github Issues page to invite people who come across your work to leave valuable insights. Why only publishing a paper, if you can publish everything related to your work, including papers? It contains reports of meetings, brainstorms, concept items I'm working on, definitions, bibliography, ... Literally everything. **Document everything** - a useful tip!
|
||||
My way to get feedback is to follow in Jake's footsteps and to simply [publish **everything** on Github](https://wgroeneveld.github.io/phd). Add a big "feedback" button that redirects to the Github Issues page to invite people who come across your work to leave valuable insights. Why only publishing a paper, if you can publish everything related to your work, including papers? It contains reports of meetings, brainstorms, concept items I'm working on, definitions, bibliography, ... Literally everything. **Document everything** - a useful tip!
|
||||
|
||||
Another way to get feedback if you're developing is using your trusty Unit Tests and Continuous Integration system. As I'm not coding for my PhD, this might not apply, you might think. But actually, I can still take those concepts and try to apply them to my writing:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue