typo
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b67c46448
commit
558235e568
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Ana Rodrigues [too deleted her Spotify account](https://ohhelloana.blog/goodbye-
|
|||
|
||||
I wonder how we can achieve what Natalia's talk was all about---_working towards a greener world from behind the keyboard_, or, in other words, _frugal computing_. I mean, I know what the concept is about, and it's quite obvious what needs to be done (less!), but in a world where everything needs to be upscaled instead of downscaled, who's going to listen to the few voices swimming against the current?
|
||||
|
||||
At my current client, we're leveraging Kubernetes' isolated throwaway-pod system to auto-upscale and deploy clusters. Distributed---that is, _cloud-based_---enterprise solutions are without a single doubt less environmental friendly than their classic client-server counterparts: modern software is often upscaled too fast, and mordern software is needlessly complex/distributed across multiple energy consumers. Environmentalism apparently is never a key decisive part of the engineering puzzle.
|
||||
At my current client, we're leveraging Kubernetes' isolated throwaway-pod system to auto-upscale and deploy clusters. Distributed---that is, _cloud-based_---enterprise solutions are without a single doubt less environmental friendly than their classic client-server counterparts: modern software is often upscaled too fast, and modern software is needlessly complex/distributed across multiple energy consumers. Environmentalism apparently is never a key decisive part of the engineering puzzle.
|
||||
|
||||
The most conspicuous example is of course (yet again) generative AI. A few days ago, Nature published an article proclaiming that [Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring---and mostly secret](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00478-x):
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue