on writing for yourself in public: feedback
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdf43d4aac
commit
0dbbe26f7d
|
@ -38,3 +38,7 @@ Writing in public with low monthly visitor counts has the additional benefit of
|
|||
But yes, I admit: I still prefer _one_ mail over no mail at all. As Henrik Karlsson writes, _a blog post is a very long and complex search query to find fascinating people and [make them route interesting stuff to your inbox](https://www.henrikkarlsson.xyz/p/search-query)_. I still prefer writing in public, thereby hopefully positively influencing my little community the same way as my little community influences me.
|
||||
|
||||
Others approach writing in public differently. For example, Julia Evans' [tactics for writing in public](https://jvns.ca/blog/2023/08/07/tactics-for-writing-in-public/) can act as sound advice for very technical howto-like writers. For me, these do not align with how I envision the act of _brain baking_, but for you, these might make much more sense than the rubbish you're currently reading.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Addendum, 8th Nov: a reader reached out and mentioned the interesting distinction between writing and publishing. The act of writing doesn't have to end in output for someone: it can just be brain exercise---to build one's inner world. Publishing, on the other hand, could mean having to polish the thoughts in order for it to be good enough for others to read. Also, is a lack of feedback an indicator of a good or bad piece? Thanks for sharing these thoughts!
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue